FORCED FLU VACCINATION BILL PASSES SENATE (Pandemic Preparedness Bill)

Forced flu shots are on there way. If you refuse the shot you will be removed from society. A new bill, the Pandemic Response Bill, S. 2028, has passed the Massachusetts state Senate and is now awaiting approval in the House. This bill suspends virtually all Constitutional rights of Massachusetts citizens and forces anyone suspected of being infected to submit to interrogations, decontaminations and vaccines. It also sets fines up to 00 per day for anyone who refuses to submit to …

25 Responses to “FORCED FLU VACCINATION BILL PASSES SENATE (Pandemic Preparedness Bill)”

  1. swimkin on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    injected -not enjected.

    I realize the significance of all these mandates, but can’t stand misspellings.

    BTW NY rescinded the mandatory vaccines for their health care workers. Could it be bc a reporter asked NY State Commissioner Daines about his wife’s association with Goldman Sachs (funding the flu vaccines) within an hour he rescinded the order!

  2. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Finally a post I completely agree with. I don’t know if “you” actually refers to me personally or a general sense of the word. I never claimed that I was confused and it would be incorrect for you to assume that I am confused if that’s actually what you had intended. I will admit that I DON’T always know what to do nor do I possess absolute clarity, but as far as a developed perspective goes, few people have been able to revise my understanding and when It happens it’s a wonderful feeling.

  3. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Posting a video that reflects what you happen to feel or believe about obscure actions of government is perfectly reasonable as is debating the subject. To debate in a mature and respectable manner is to do so without insult. The mere occurrence of YOU shouting wacko etc invalidates your ability to debate, and though you’ve proved yourself at least intelligent enough to support your reasoning, you remain over confident and impervious to alternate perspective.

  4. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You have made several claims so far, indicating that you “know”. The only claim I have made is that you are being impolite and that your opinion is pigheaded. These are indisputable facts. Almost every claim you have made is not only disputable but mostly incorrect. Saying “I am right” is a claim to truth. Believing it states that I am open to varying perspectives and can accept the possibility I may be wrong. The fact that you don’t recognize that substantiates your ignorance.

  5. NeoNeonCircuitRider on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    “Or ulse you’ll be dragged out of your home…..”

    ulse.

    That one’s awesome.

    SPELL CHECK IF YOU WANT TO BE CREDIBLE!

  6. NeoNeonCircuitRider on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You can’t even spell MAYOR correctly…….. I don’t even know what to say about that.

  7. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    However, the method is sound.

    People who claim to seek the truth should understand that they need to educate themselves before they will be able to form an understanding or meaningful opinion of the data.

    I know educating ones self is harder than just accepting another person’s interpretation based on mutual identifiers with the presenter, but it is the only way to relieve the perceived ambiguities and confusion you feel.

  8. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Peer reviews enable people who understand the data to do away with misinterpretations through intelligent discussion. Lay people who don’t understand the method or the data listen in on some of these discussions for pieces they can use to support their preconceived “beliefs” and run with those pieces shouting them as loud as possible to anyone who will listen. Which completely misrepresents scientific study to the masses.

    I’m not saying all scientists are impartial as money can buy a lot.

  9. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You are too funny.
    “I never stated that “I am right”. I happen to believe that I am right”

    Are you messing with me or what?

    Do you have any idea what science is? Science is the Methodical and impartial observation of nature”. That is it. No opinions in science, just look and see methodology.

    It is at present our unquestionably best way at getting to any truth.

    The interpretation of scientific data can be abused, that is what peer reviews are for. They work.

  10. vomit55 on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    listen to this interview from 8(!) years ago.
    she said the americans will be ripped off, standing in the streets naked, only then they’ll realize what is going on.
    Trunews interview with Dr. Tatyana Koryagina
    (take out the spaces>) h t t p : / / tr. im / DbWI

  11. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Neither of us will EVER know what we are talking about unless its to say something indisputable. That’s the beauty of debate, it can be continued for eternity, and when something is finally resolved time goes buy and people forget and have to start the debate over again. We may each read all the books in the world and still only think we know what we are talking about. After all we are basing claims off of other mortal humans who could be wrong about everything they think they know.

  12. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    If you question everything you hear you would not be assuming that people who don’t have blind faith in the “system” are wacko. I don’t really want your money, charging people for a service is a way of making sure that one is serious about receiving that service. Charging money is nothing new. I admit that I don’t understand it because in order for me to claim that I do understand would be the make an inhuman and impossible claim. The more you learn the more you realize how little you know.

  13. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Again you are claiming something which I have not purported. I never stated that “I am right”. I happen to believe that I am right and that you blatantly agree with science because its science. Science is something I work with on an everyday basis and factual data can be abused and for profit it is. Just listen to a presidential speech, all kinds of claims and big words are used without conveying anything substantial. Its an art.

  14. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Science its self has been used to manipulate peoples understanding of all sorts of things. Vaccines started off with a place in the world, then it became an industry and now kids grow up getting 45 shots by the time they are five. I just don’t think its necessary. The system uses diseases to implicate fear so that you go and get a shot, which causes more disease by weakening the body so that you keep going back to the hospital. There is always opinion, data can be misapplied/misinterpreted.

  15. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    I referred to people calling vaccines “liquid bullets” whackos. Specifically someone whom had just demonstrated his ignorance with a completely fictional and nonsensical account of how a vaccine works.

    There is no OPINION when it comes to the science behind a vaccine, just cold hard observable fact for anyone who wishes to take the time to observe anyway. For everyone else it’s just scary magic I guess.

  16. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Bullshit. The only way to progress understanding is to freely challenge ideas. This video challenged mine so I responded with a return challenge and asked a few of logical questions, of the Conspiracy theorists perspective none the less! What I get in return is, “I’m right because the knowledge is out there”. Give me a break.

    Yes I do know what to do. I educate thoroughly so I can make informed decisions, and I explain them freely to anyone who care to ask or listen.

  17. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    I think that it is very obvious I do in fact question everything I hear. I have questioned this conspiracy theory and all you have responded with is, “I don’t understand it, it’s complicated”, “give me money”, “knowledge is out there”. You’re right about that last one at least, but you’re not going to find it in a david icke book or on an episode of coast to coast.

    You should know that I didn’t consider you a dim witted moron until you proved it in your every response and vagary.

  18. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Sure, U.S History, what aspect specifically? The founding of the treasury? Prevalence of free masonry among founding fathers? Curing POLIO, C Pox, Diphtheria??

    While I’m at it why don’t you pick up a few back issues of the new england journal of medicine. A couple books on biology and virology, just so we both know what the hell we are talking about, cool?

    As informed as you are I’m sure you can explain how scientists went about deciding which strain of Swine fllu to inoculate?

  19. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You are clearly confident. I don’t wish to change you. You insulted me by calling anyone who believes that a group of rich elites who seek power over people worldwide is a whacko. I don’t really mind being called a whacko, because I believe that you are choosing the path of ignorance and by calling me a whacko is really calling yourself even worse. Anyway we should find a different page to argue on or discontinue this nonsense. Take care and read up on your US history.

  20. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You made it clear how you think in a post. Anyone with an opinion that differs from your own is a whacko.

  21. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    I have only taken up the responsibility to retrieve that “information detrimental to human survival”. It’s not mine, I did not make it appear out of thin air. I don’t own it, I only charge money so that I know I’m not wasting my time on someone who can not be taught to begin with. BTW what is understanding? In order for you to say I don’t understand is to claim that you do understand. When did I say power is measured by how many people they can kill? You ARE right about this being absurd.

  22. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Who is it that you think I should be helping exactly? I have tried to help you by explaining that it is impolite and disrespectful to call people whacko without knowing why they believe what they do. If everyone who thinks differently is a nutcase then you may as well join Hitler and start your own mass extermination program so that the only people left are those who think like you. Dim witted? In your perspective fine. Scared, I don’t think so. Confused? Do you know what to do?

  23. zephyrargilopod on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    I’d love to explain it to you, and present valid arguement etc, but in only 500 characters per post? Come now its taken years for me to accumulate this perspective I can’t just wave my hands and bestow it upon you. Find out for yourself the knowledge is out there. Question everything you see and hear especially that coming from governments and from conspiracy nuts. You may consider me a dim witted moron if you please and maybe that allows you to sleep better at night. Good luck with that.

  24. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    You are defrauding people even more dim witted, scared and confused than yourself. Either way, it’s sad, you should give it up and figure out a way to be helpful.

  25. OhmySKoD on October 30th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Don’t claim to understand how I think as you clearly have no idea. You, thus far have been unable to compile even the most rudimentary of arguments and continually make wild aimless claims with no explanations. In short, you are completely full of shit, and I bet you know it, which is why you hide behind statements like, “I charge $ for my knowledge”. Either you have real knowledge and are selfishly forcing people to work at futile jobs in order to for you to impart it one piece at a time, OR

Got something to say?